{"id":459195,"date":"2026-07-08T12:39:40","date_gmt":"2026-07-08T10:39:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.eunews.it\/2026\/07\/08\/tribunale-ue-legittimi-gli-aiuti-italiani-da-130-milioni-alle-compagnie-aeree-per-le-perdite-nel-covid-19\/"},"modified":"2026-07-08T13:16:47","modified_gmt":"2026-07-08T11:16:47","slug":"eu-court-italys-130-million-aid-package-to-airlines-for-losses-incurred-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-is-lawful","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.eunews.it\/en\/2026\/07\/08\/eu-court-italys-130-million-aid-package-to-airlines-for-losses-incurred-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-is-lawful\/","title":{"rendered":"EU Court: Italy\u2019s 130 million aid package to airlines for losses incurred during the Covid\u201119 pandemic is lawful"},"content":{"rendered":"

Brussels \u2013 The 130 million euros in state aid provided by Italy to certain airlines holding Italian licences as compensation for losses incurred during the Covid-19 pandemic is \u201cin accordance with European Union law\u201d and \u201ccompatible with the internal market.<\/strong>\u201d This was ruled by the EU General Court<\/a>, one of the two bodies that make up the Court of Justice of the EU<\/a>, rejecting two actions brought by <\/a>Ryanair<\/a>. The Irish low-cost airline argued that the aid scheme unduly favoured Italian airlines, or at least those holding an Italian licence, and that the European Commission should therefore not have authorised the measure.<\/p>\n

Italy notified the European Commission of the aid scheme in October 2020<\/strong>. The scheme, worth 130 million euros, was intended to compensate airlines for losses incurred between 1 March and 15 June 2020 <\/strong>due to travel restrictions and other containment measures implemented to limit the spread of Covid-19<\/strong>. The Commission had approved the scheme, but Ryanair challenged the decision and, on 24 May, 2023, the General Court ruled in its favour<\/strong>, annulling the Commission\u2019s authorisation<\/strong>. According to the judges, Brussels had not provided sufficient reasoning <\/strong>for its approval decision as regards the
\neligibility condition of the aid scheme related to minimum remuneration. <\/strong>The matter, however, did not end there. In a 23 January 2025 judgment, the Court of Justice of the European Union set aside the judgment and referred the case back to the General Court for it to rule again.<\/strong><\/p>\n

In the meantime, the aid scheme had been amended and extended to also cover the period from 16 June to 31 December 2020<\/strong>. On 13 October 2023, Italy notified the extension and amendment of the compensation measure for 2021, while also
\nproviding for an increase of 100 million euros in the budget. The Commission approved that measure too, and its decision is also the subject of an action brought by Ryanair before the General Court.<\/p>\n

In today\u2019s judgement (8 July), the Court ruled that the mechanism chosen by Italy to distribute aid to airlines affected by the pandemic<\/strong> was lawful. According to the judges, restricting support to companies holding an Italian licence \u201cis not an infringement of the principle of non-discrimination\u201d because it is aimed at the companies most affected by the measures prohibiting or restricting flights to or from Italy in the context of the pandemic.<\/p>\n

\n

The Court also ruled out any infringement with regard to the minimum remuneration condition<\/strong>, considering it to be neutral with respect to the nationality of the airlines, as it \u201cdoes not by itself entail a difference in treatment
\naccording to the nationality of the airlines but is applied according to the home base of employees.\u201d Finally, Ryanair has not
\ndemonstrated that the “requirement to hold an Italian licence would produce restrictive effects going beyond those
\nthat are inherent in State aid granted under EU law or that that requirement was such as to discourage Ryanair from
\ncarrying out its activities in Italy.\u201d In other words, it did not prove that the requirement to hold an Italian licence unlawfully restricted the freedom of establishment or the freedom to provide services, nor that the Commission had provided insufficient reasoning for its decision.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ryanair\u2019s appeals have been dismissed. According to the judges, reserving support for companies with an Italian licence does not breach the principle of non-discrimination, as it is aimed at those companies most affected by the measures prohibiting or restricting flights to and from the Italian mainland<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7896,"featured_media":459172,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"episode_type":"","audio_file":"","podmotor_file_id":"","podmotor_episode_id":"","cover_image":"","cover_image_id":"","duration":"","filesize":"","filesize_raw":"","date_recorded":"","explicit":"","block":"","jnews-multi-image_gallery":[],"jnews_single_post":{"format":"standard","override":[{"template":"1","parallax":"1","fullscreen":"1","layout":"right-sidebar","sidebar":"default-sidebar","second_sidebar":"default-sidebar","sticky_sidebar":"1","share_position":"top","share_float_style":"share-monocrhome","show_featured":"1","show_post_meta":"1","show_post_author":"1","show_post_author_image":"1","show_post_date":"1","post_date_format":"default","post_date_format_custom":"Y\/m\/d","show_post_category":"1","show_post_reading_time":"0","post_reading_time_wpm":"300","post_calculate_word_method":"str_word_count","show_zoom_button":"0","zoom_button_out_step":"2","zoom_button_in_step":"3","show_post_tag":"1","show_prev_next_post":"1","show_popup_post":"1","show_comment_section":"1","number_popup_post":"1","show_author_box":"0","show_post_related":"1","show_inline_post_related":"0"}],"image_override":[{"single_post_thumbnail_size":"crop-500","single_post_gallery_size":"crop-500"}],"trending_post_position":"meta","trending_post_label":"Trending","sponsored_post_label":"Sponsored by","disable_ad":"0","subtitle":""},"jnews_primary_category":[],"jnews_override_counter":{"view_counter_number":"0","share_counter_number":"0","like_counter_number":"0","dislike_counter_number":"0"},"footnotes":""},"categories":[25705,25712],"tags":[31431,27419,30979,28829,34748,34749,31044],"class_list":["post-459195","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-business","category-general-news","tag-company-aeree-and","tag-covid-19-en","tag-court-of-justice-dellue-en","tag-tribunal-ue-en","tag-low-cost","tag-pandemia-covid-19","tag-ryanair-en-2"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.eunews.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/459195","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.eunews.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.eunews.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.eunews.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7896"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.eunews.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=459195"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.eunews.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/459195\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":459196,"href":"https:\/\/www.eunews.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/459195\/revisions\/459196"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.eunews.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/459172"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.eunews.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=459195"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.eunews.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=459195"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.eunews.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=459195"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}