- Europe, like you've never read before -
Friday, 25 July 2025
No Result
View All Result
  • it ITA
  • en ENG
Eunews
  • Politics
  • World
  • Business
  • News
  • Defence
  • Net & Tech
  • Agrifood
  • Other sections
    • Culture
    • Diritti
    • Energy
    • Green Economy
    • Finance & Insurance
    • Industry & Markets
    • Media
    • Mobility & Logistics
    • Sports
  • Newsletter
  • European 2024
    Eunews
    • Politics
    • World
    • Business
    • News
    • Defence
    • Net & Tech
    • Agrifood
    • Other sections
      • Culture
      • Diritti
      • Energy
      • Green Economy
      • Finance & Insurance
      • Industry & Markets
      • Media
      • Mobility & Logistics
      • Sports
    No Result
    View All Result
    Eunews
    No Result
    View All Result

    Home » Politics » The saga of Italian migrant centres in Albania turning into repatriation centres. For the EU it can be done, but they are not return hubs

    The saga of Italian migrant centres in Albania turning into repatriation centres. For the EU it can be done, but they are not return hubs

    According to the European Commission, conversion to return hubs is "in accordance with EU law" because "national law" will apply within them. They are therefore not to be considered akin to the return hubs in third countries proposed by Brussels

    Simone De La Feld</a> <a class="social twitter" href="https://twitter.com/@SimoneDeLaFeld1" target="_blank">@SimoneDeLaFeld1</a> by Simone De La Feld @SimoneDeLaFeld1
    31 March 2025
    in Politics
    centri migranti albania

    (FILES) A group of migrants, intercepted in Italian waters, disembark at Shengjin port in Albania on October 16, 2024. Italy's government agreed on March 28, 2025 to change who will be held in its migrant centres in Albania, but experts warned the legal challenges that have effectively frozen the scheme until now remain. The government announced after a council of ministers meeting that its two facilities designed to be processing centres for potential asylum seekers intercepted at sea would now also serve as repatriation centres to hold migrants due to be sent back to their home countries. (Photo by Adnan Beci / AFP)

    Brussels – “In principle,”  the conversion of the failed Italian migrant centres in Albania into detention centres for repatriation “complies with EU law.” The assist to the Meloni government comes directly from the European Commission, which explains, “According to our information, Italian national law would apply in these centres.” The conditional is a must because, for the past year, everything revolving around the controversial nearly one billion euro project strongly backed by the premier is shrouded in uncertainty.

    Inevitable, given the unfamiliar legal terrain on which Brussels and Rome are moving in parallel in their attempts to combat irregular migration. The former opens to the possibility for member states to enter into bilateral agreements with third countries to detain on their territory migrant persons awaiting repatriation to their countries of origin; the latter readjusts with a decree law the intended use of Albanian centres originally designed for the accelerated procedures of migrant persons intercepted at sea and blocked repeatedly by Italian judges.

    The centre of Gjader under construction (Photo by Adnan Beci / AFP)

    A misunderstanding arises here. Because the EU Commissioner for Home Affairs himself, Magnus Brunner, in presenting the proposal by Brussels on return hubs, had made it clear that such centres would not comply with European law at least until the end of the legislative process, which goes through the European Parliament and the member states and which, on such a sensitive dossier, could last several months if not years. Moreover, the European Commission’s proposal is decidedly generic and delegates to agreements between countries “the specifics of the return hub model.” The conditions of stay, the maximum length of detention, and possible scenarios at the end of detention.

    The ploy that had made possible, according to Brussels, the plan to outsource asylum procedures to Albania is that in the Shengjin and Gjader centres, Italian jurisdiction would be applied. In essence, the validity of the Italy-Albania Protocol is based on this legal construction whereby the centres are not technically on Albanian territory but on an extension of Italian territory where border procedures can be conducted.

    albania

    The Italian centre at the Port of Shengjin, northwest of Tirana, 11-10-2024 (Photo by Adnan Beci / AFP)

    This legal fiction was confirmed with the transformation to CPR. Conversely, it would be necessary to reopen the Protocol and hear what Edi Rama thinks about it. That is why today (March 31), Markus Lammert, spokesman for the European Commission for Home Affairs, was able to explain, “What is not possible to implement is the concept of return hubs, and Italy is now making use of national legislation.” In this sense, the Gjader centre (the only one for which conversion to CPR is planned) is nothing more than an Italian detention centre for repatriation, in the same way as the ten others in Italy.

    This does not automatically mean that everything will go smoothly for Meloni. For example, if Italy successfully transfers migrants who have already been ordered to be returned to such centres, it cannot repatriate them through an airport in Albania because that would constitute an illegal transfer under European law. It would have to bring them back to Italy first, with the associated costs and timelines. At the European Commission’s OK, the Italian right immediately cheered. From the European Parliament in Strasbourg, Carlo Fidanza (FdI-ECR) said that Brussels “confirms the goodness of the Meloni model and the legitimacy of the Albania model, waiting to have the definition of a European list of safe countries to carry out repatriations without having more surprises from a part of the politicized judiciary that has prevented us so far from going all the way.”

    In fact, the government has not given up on making the Albanian centres operational for their original purpose, to divert migrants intercepted in international waters and likely to be subjected to expedited procedures directly to Albania. Simplifying, Meloni and Piantedosi’s idea was to take to Albania migrants from countries deemed safe (by Italy), who would then be easily refused asylum. But Italian courts, relying on an Oct. 4 ruling by the EU Court of Justice, found that the countries of origin of the migrants in question could not be considered safe. In yet another wink to Meloni and the European right, von der Leyen promised that the EU would draw up a common list of safe countries, thus breaking the deadlock on the Albania model.

    Until then, Gjader may be (unfortunately, given the repeated testimonials of human rights violations, not least by the Council of Europe) another Gradisca d’Isonzo, another Palazzo san Gervasio in Potenza, a Via Corelli in Milan or Ponte Galeria in Rome.

    English version by the Translation Service of Withub
    Tags: migrantsprotocol italy albaniareturn hubs

    Related Posts

    General News

    Immigration: 119,155 returns in the EU in 2024 out of 453,840 deportation orders

    31 March 2025
    albania
    Diritti

    EU shows the way, and Italian centres in Albania become the first return hubs

    25 March 2025
    rimpatri
    Politics

    Brussels unveils crackdown on returns and proposes third-country detention hubs

    11 March 2025
    rimpatri
    World politics

    Repatriation hubs, EU Fundamental Rights Agency fears: no to lawless zones

    6 February 2025
    (credits: Sameer Al-Doumy / Afp)
    Politics

    PD, AVS, and M5S demand explanations from EU on “(un)safe countries” identified by Italy

    26 November 2024
    This aerial photo shows the site of a recently build Italian-run migrant centre at the port of Shengjin, some 60 kms northwest of Tirana, on October 11, 2024. Controversial camps set up in Albania to house migrants rescued in Italian waters are ready to start functioning, the Italian ambassador in Tirana said today. The deal, signed in November by Italian Prime Minister and Albanian counterpart, was sharply criticised by rights groups. They say it is illegal under international law, warning that Albania, a non-EU country offers limited protection for asylum seekers. (Photo by Adnan Beci / AFP)
    Politics

    New stop to Italy-Albania protocol. Backtrack for seven more migrants, Rome judges call in EU court

    11 November 2024
    map visualization
    Flourish logoA Flourish map
    consolato Iran Istanbul

    In Istanbul, Iranians and Europeans strive to keep the JCPOA alive and avert sanctions—for now

    by Francesco Bortoletto bortoletto_f
    25 July 2025

    In the first meeting between the Islamic Republic and Western powers after the war with Israel, the negotiating teams from...

    Vacanza ENmorning

    ENmorning goes on vacation

    by Federico Baccini @federicobaccini
    25 July 2025

    Until early September, following the work calendar of EU institutions. ENweek will accompany you throughout the summer

    Isabel Vansteenkiste (sinistra) sarà la nuova consigliera particolare della presidente della Bce, Christine Lagarade (destra).
[foto: European Central Bank; Wikimedia Commons]

    ECB: Christine Lagarde’s new principal advisor is a Flemish-Belgian economist

    by Emanuele Bonini emanuelebonini
    25 July 2025

    As of September 15, Isabel Vansteenkiste replaces the German Roland Straub in one of the key roles at the ECB....

    Emmanuel Macron

    France will recognize Palestine, Macron says. Israel and the US fume: ‘It rewards terrorism’

    by Francesco Bortoletto bortoletto_f
    25 July 2025

    The French president revives the diplomatic initiative long pursued by Paris, sparking outrage from Tel Aviv and Washington. A high-level...

    • Director’s Point of View
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Opinions
    • About us
    • Contacts
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie policy

    Eunews is a registered newspaper
    Press Register of the Court of Turin n° 27


     

    Copyright © 2025 - WITHUB S.p.a., Via Rubens 19 - 20148 Milan
    VAT number: 10067080969 - ROC registration number n.30628
    Fully paid-up share capital 50.000,00€

     

    No Result
    View All Result
    • it ITA
    • en ENG
    • Newsletter
    • Politics
    • World politics
    • Business
    • General News
    • Defence & Security
    • Net & Tech
    • Agrifood
    • Altre sezioni
      • European Agenda
      • Culture
      • Diritti
      • Energy
      • Green Economy
      • Gallery
      • Finance & Insurance
      • Industry & Markets
      • Letters to the Editor
      • Media
      • Mobility & Logistics
      • News
      • Opinions
      • Sports
    • Director's Point of View
    • L’Europa come non l’avete mai ascoltata
    • Draghi Report
    • Eventi
    • Eunews Newsletter

    No Result
    View All Result
    • it ITA
    • en ENG
    • Newsletter
    • Politics
    • World politics
    • Business
    • General News
    • Defence & Security
    • Net & Tech
    • Agrifood
    • Altre sezioni
      • European Agenda
      • Culture
      • Diritti
      • Energy
      • Green Economy
      • Gallery
      • Finance & Insurance
      • Industry & Markets
      • Letters to the Editor
      • Media
      • Mobility & Logistics
      • News
      • Opinions
      • Sports
    • Director's Point of View
    • L’Europa come non l’avete mai ascoltata
    • Draghi Report
    • Eventi
    • Eunews Newsletter

    Attention

    We value your privacy
    We and our 1505 partners store and/or access information on a device, such as cookies and process personal data, such as unique identifiers and standard information sent by a device for personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development. With your permission we and our 1505 partners may use precise geolocation data and identification through device scanning. You may click to consent to our and our 1505 partners’ processing as described above. Alternatively you may access more detailed information and change your preferences before consenting or to refuse consenting. Please note that some processing of your personal data may not require your consent, but you have a right to object to such processing. Your preferences will apply to this website only. You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by returning to this site and clicking the privacy policy button at the bottom of the webpage.