- Europe, like you've never read before -
Monday, 2 November 2026
No Result
View All Result
  • en ENG
  • it ITA
Eunews
  • Politics
  • World
  • Business
  • News
  • Defence
  • Health
  • Agrifood
  • Other sections
    • Culture
    • Rights
    • Energy
    • Green Economy
    • Finance & Insurance
    • Industry & Markets
    • Media
    • Mobility & Logistics
    • Net & Tech
    • Sports
  • European 2024
    Eunews
    • Politics
    • World
    • Business
    • News
    • Defence
    • Health
    • Agrifood
    • Other sections
      • Culture
      • Rights
      • Energy
      • Green Economy
      • Finance & Insurance
      • Industry & Markets
      • Media
      • Mobility & Logistics
      • Net & Tech
      • Sports
    No Result
    View All Result
    Eunews
    No Result
    View All Result

    Home » General News » EU court: ‘Clicking on button that sends the order implies the obligation to pay, and this should be specified’

    EU court: ‘Clicking on button that sends the order implies the obligation to pay, and this should be specified’

    Luxembourg court clarifies online shopping rules, transparency, and consumer rights. In case of non-specification, users can opt out of the purchase

    Ezio Baldari</a> <a class="social twitter" href="https://twitter.com/@eziobaldari" target="_blank">@eziobaldari</a> by Ezio Baldari @eziobaldari
    30 May 2024
    in General News

    Brussels – Order and payment go hand in hand. The former implies the latter, especially for online transactions on the Internet. It may seem obvious, but it is not. Or rather, it wasn’t, so the European Court of Justice cleared the field of misunderstandings, clarifying that “the order submission button or a similar function must explicitly indicate that, by clicking on it, the consumer submits to an obligation to pay.”

    The consumer rights directive provides clear terms and conditions regarding service requests. Under EU law, the Luxembourg courts specify, “the trader shall ensure that the consumer, when placing his order, explicitly acknowledges that the order implies an obligation to pay.” Before the actual payment, a preliminary buyer-seller relationship is created. A sort of contract that implies having to put your hand in your wallet at a later date.

    The Luxembourg courts are keen to point out that whether the payment is immediate or subsequent does not change the obligations of the service provider. In any case, however, the order confirmation must state that a payment will follow. Otherwise, the user may reserve the right to abandon the transaction. “If the trader has not complied with his duty to inform, the consumer shall not be bound by the contract or order.”

    English version by the Translation Service of Withub
    Tags: consumer rightscourte-commerceinternetue cut

    Related Posts

    No Content Available
    map visualization
    La resa dei conti sulla giustizia in Polonia: lo scontro tra Tusk e Nawrocki riapre la ferita del PiS

    Poland’s judicial reckoning: Tusk-Nawrocki clash reopens the PiS-era wound

    by Annachiara Magenta annacmag
    2 November 2026

    Tensions came to a head on 30 October, when Judge Anna Korwin-Piotrowska announced the one-month suspension of the President of...

    Bart De Wever, Primo ministro (Copyright: European Union)

    Belgian government in turmoil over budget: King puts Prime Minister De Wever’s resignation on hold

    by Redazione eunewsit
    2 November 2026

    A 5 per cent deficit, 10 billion to be saved and a divided coalition: the stakes also involve the European...

    Smiling at the press conference following the EU-Canada Summit were the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, the President of the European Council, Antonio Costa, and the Canadian Prime Minister, Mark Carney. Source: EU Commission

    Canadian Dry, the epochal in search of content

    by Roberto Zangrandi
    2 November 2026

    The Alliance for the Future as read from Québec to Calgary, the near silence of America days before the midterms,...

    L'ambasciatore degli Stati Uniti presso le Nazioni Unite, Mike Waltz, ha espresso rammarico per il veto della Russia alla risoluzione. Source: Imagoeconomica

    Sahara: Russia vetoes US resolution; Morocco hails the end of MINURSO

    by Redazione eunewsit
    2 November 2026

    Brussels – A new phase has begun in the Sahara issue following the United Nations Security Council vote on 30...

    • Director’s Point of View
    • Opinions
    • About us
    • Contacts
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie policy

    Eunews is a registered newspaper
    Press Register of the Court of Turin n° 27

    Copyright © 2025 - WITHUB S.p.a., Via Savona 127/B, 20144 Milano
    VAT number: 10067080969 - ROC registration number n.30628
    Fully paid-up share capital 50.000,00€

     

    No Result
    View All Result
    • en ENG
    • it ITA
    • Politics
    • Newsletter
    • World politics
    • Business
    • General News
    • Defence & Security
    • Health
    • Agrifood
    • Altre sezioni
      • Culture
      • Rights
      • Energy
      • Green Economy
      • Gallery
      • Finance & Insurance
      • Industry & Markets
      • Media
      • Mobility & Logistics
      • Net & Tech
      • News
      • Opinions
      • Sports
    • Director’s Point of View
    • Draghi Report
    • Eunews Newsletter

    No Result
    View All Result
    • en ENG
    • it ITA
    • Politics
    • Newsletter
    • World politics
    • Business
    • General News
    • Defence & Security
    • Health
    • Agrifood
    • Altre sezioni
      • Culture
      • Rights
      • Energy
      • Green Economy
      • Gallery
      • Finance & Insurance
      • Industry & Markets
      • Media
      • Mobility & Logistics
      • Net & Tech
      • News
      • Opinions
      • Sports
    • Director’s Point of View
    • Draghi Report
    • Eunews Newsletter

    Attention