- Europe, like you've never read before -
Tuesday, 13 October 2026
No Result
View All Result
  • it ITA
  • en ENG
Eunews
  • Politics
  • World
  • Business
  • News
  • Defence
  • Health
  • Agrifood
  • Other sections
    • Culture
    • Rights
    • Energy
    • Green Economy
    • Finance & Insurance
    • Industry & Markets
    • Media
    • Mobility & Logistics
    • Net & Tech
    • Sports
  • European 2024
    Eunews
    • Politics
    • World
    • Business
    • News
    • Defence
    • Health
    • Agrifood
    • Other sections
      • Culture
      • Rights
      • Energy
      • Green Economy
      • Finance & Insurance
      • Industry & Markets
      • Media
      • Mobility & Logistics
      • Net & Tech
      • Sports
    No Result
    View All Result
    Eunews
    No Result
    View All Result

    Home » Green Economy » ECA: “Recovery fund less ‘green’ than claimed”

    ECA: “Recovery fund less ‘green’ than claimed”

    Luxembourg auditors chastise the Commission and denounce 34.5 billion overestimates. They urge developing sustainability tools "in an appropriate way" for the future.

    Emanuele Bonini</a> <a class="social twitter" href="https://twitter.com/emanuelebonini" target="_blank">emanuelebonini</a> by Emanuele Bonini emanuelebonini
    11 September 2024
    in Green Economy

    Brussels – The Recovery Fund, the special financial instrument embedded in the NextGenerationEU post-pandemic recovery mechanism that finances national recovery plans (NRRP), “is not as green as claimed.” The European Court of Auditors rejects the “green” aspirations of the European Commission, which had also wanted to mandatorily allocate more than a third of resources (37 per cent) to sustainability measures. “Not all measures labelled as “green” have been judged as such,” notes the special report of the Luxembourg auditors. Thus, there are “shortcomings in the design of the device and the implementation of green transition measures.” In addition, “there is not full knowledge” of the amounts actually spent on climate action in EU countries.

    In light of these “weaknesses” identified in the design and implementation of the Recovery Fund, the report’s conclusion “calls into question the achievement of the climate and environmental goals of
    the latter.” Accordingly, the ECA thinks that “the contribution of the recovery facility to the green transition is unclear“.

    Auditors do the math, and it doesn’t add up for them. The European Commission has estimated that, as of February 2024, measures to support the climate goals under the Green Deal as part of the Green and Sustainable Transition have reached about €275 billion in Recovery funds. However, the Court warns that these contributions could be overestimated by at least €34.5 billion, partly due to the discrepancy between declared measures and their implementation. In short, the use of the Recovery appears to be a bit of a mess. 

    The Recovery Fund “currently suffers from a high level of approximation” in its implementation plans, “as well as discrepancies between planning and practice, and ultimately provides little guidance as to the extent to which the money is being used directly for the green transition,” summarizes Joëlle Elvinger, Member of the Court responsible for the report.

    In light of these findings, the European Commission is urged to correct its course. The outgoing von der Leyen team is being asked to “improve the reporting of climate expenditures under the facility for recovery and resilience” and “enhance” the performance of green transition measures right away. For the future, and thus to the von der Leyen team to come, it is urged to “ensure that future financing instruments aimed at supporting target values and climate and environmental goals are appropriately designed.” A call that nails the community executive to its responsibilities.

    This is not the first time the ECA has raised concerns about the response strategy to the crisis produced by the COVID-19 pandemic. A previous report had already called out the burden passed on to the next generation, turning the spotlight on future fallout.

    English version by the Translation Service of Withub
    Tags: court of auditorsgreen transitionpnrrrecovery fundshootingsustainability

    Related Posts

    Business

    ECA: “Recovery Fund guarantees dumped on future generations”

    2 April 2024
    map visualization
    L’Alta rappresentante per la politica estera e di sicurezza dell’UE, Kaja Kallas. Crediti: Consiglio dell'Unione europea

    Disinformation, Kallas: “Dozens of Russian websites used to recruit mercenaries in Africa have been taken down”

    by Iolanda Cuomo
    12 October 2026

    Brussels – There is one overriding priority: to counter the network of mercenary soldiers controlled by the Kremlin. For this...

    Ursula von der Leyen (Foto tratta da un video del Parlamento europeo)

    Von der Leyen launches the Anti-Gold-Plating Pact: an end to national rules that are stricter than those laid down by the EU

    by Perla Ressese
    12 October 2026

    The rules agreed in Brussels must not become more complicated when transposed by Member States; the signing by the end...

    Elezioni parlamentari in Russia. Crediti: Imagoeconomica via Er.ru

    The EU Council imposes sanctions on the organisers of the Russian Duma elections in the occupied Ukrainian territories

    by Iolanda Cuomo
    12 October 2026

    A total of 77 people have been affected: 74 people on the parties’ lists and 3 members of the Central...

    Pescatori nel porto di Savona. Crediti: Marco Cremonesi via Imagoeconomica

    Fisheries: report on the WestMed plan for management in the Mediterranean approved

    by Redazione eunewsit
    12 October 2026

    Lupo (PD): proportionate rules and at least 7.29 billion in the next EU budget”

    • Director’s Point of View
    • Opinions
    • About us
    • Contacts
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie policy

    Eunews is a registered newspaper
    Press Register of the Court of Turin n° 27

    Copyright © 2025 - WITHUB S.p.a., Via Savona 127/B, 20144 Milano
    VAT number: 10067080969 - ROC registration number n.30628
    Fully paid-up share capital 50.000,00€

     

    No Result
    View All Result
    • it ITA
    • en ENG
    • Politics
    • Newsletter
    • World politics
    • Business
    • General News
    • Defence & Security
    • Health
    • Agrifood
    • Altre sezioni
      • Culture
      • Rights
      • Energy
      • Green Economy
      • Gallery
      • Finance & Insurance
      • Industry & Markets
      • Media
      • Mobility & Logistics
      • Net & Tech
      • News
      • Opinions
      • Sports
    • Director’s Point of View
    • Draghi Report
    • Eunews Newsletter

    No Result
    View All Result
    • it ITA
    • en ENG
    • Politics
    • Newsletter
    • World politics
    • Business
    • General News
    • Defence & Security
    • Health
    • Agrifood
    • Altre sezioni
      • Culture
      • Rights
      • Energy
      • Green Economy
      • Gallery
      • Finance & Insurance
      • Industry & Markets
      • Media
      • Mobility & Logistics
      • Net & Tech
      • News
      • Opinions
      • Sports
    • Director’s Point of View
    • Draghi Report
    • Eunews Newsletter

    Attention